Tuesday 8 November 2011

Not all stress is bad: Optimal Stress is good for Performance

Optimal Stress is good for Performance :
The stress response is the body’s way of protecting you. When working properly, it helps you stay focused, energetic, and alert. In emergency situations, stress can save your life – giving you extra strength to defend yourself, for example, or spurring you to slam on the brakes to avoid an accident.

The stress response also helps you rise to meet challenges. Stress is what keeps you on your toes during a presentation at work, sharpens your concentration when you’re attempting the game-winning free throw, or drives you to study for an exam when you'd rather be watching TV. Imagine that if you do not have the motivation and little stress in your  mind to do anything then you would not feel disinterested in the world and would not have the enthusiasm for life activities and would  not be able to enjoy it.
But beyond a certain point, stress stops being helpful and starts causing major damage to your health, your mood, your productivity, your relationships, and your quality of life.
Stress is good - but only till certain levels:

Stress isn’t always bad. In small doses, it can help you perform under pressure and motivate you to do your best. Psychologists Robert M. Yerkes and John Dillingham Dodson (1908) has long back stated that optimum level of stress, keeps you motivated and give some  meaning in  life. Imagine, if you have nothing productive to do in a day, then it may lead to boredom. Similarly, too much of stress would lead to pain and disaster, as it may get to your nerves. When you’re constantly running in emergency mode, your mind and body pay the price.


Original Yerkes Dodson Law





Hebbian version of the Yerkes Dodson Law (this version leaves out that hyperarousal does not adversely impact simple tasks). This version is the most common version and often incorrectly cited in text books.

Levels of arousal:

Research has found that different tasks require different levels of arousal for optimal performance. For example, difficult or intellectually demanding tasks may require a lower level of arousal (to facilitate concentration), whereas tasks demanding stamina or persistence may be performed better with higher levels of arousal (to increase motivation).

Because of task differences, the shape of the curve can be highly variable. For simple or well-learned tasks, the relationship can be considered linear with improvements in performance as arousal increases. For complex, unfamiliar, or difficult tasks, the relationship between arousal and performance becomes inverse, with declines in performance as arousal increases.

The effect of task difficulty led to the hypothesis that the Yerkes–Dodson Law can be decomposed into two distinct factors – compare bathtub curve. The upward part of the inverted U can be thought of as the energizing effect of arousal. The downward part is caused by negative effects of arousal (or stress) on cognitive processes like attention (e.g., "tunnel vision"), memory, and problem-solving.
There has been research indicating that the correlation suggested by Yerkes and Dodson exists (such as that of Broadhurst, 1959; Duffy, 1962; Anderson, 1988), but a cause of the correlation has not yet successfully been established (Anderson, Revelle, & Lynch, 1989).


                                                                                                                            -   Dr Smita Pandey

No comments:

Post a Comment